These sick, perverted jurists make one want to puke. A man raped a 3-year old and the judge thought the 25-year minimum sentence was too rough on the poor widdle wapist. Really:

LOS ANGELES — A man convicted of sexually assaulting a 3-year-old girl will see 10 years in prison — down from at least 25 — after a judge decided the minimum mandatory sentence was too much, and should be considered “cruel and unusual punishment”.
“Although serious and despicable, this does not compare to a situation where a pedophiliac child predator preys on an innocent child,” Kelly told the Orange County Register. “There was no violence or callous disregard for (the victim’s) well-being.” 

“In looking at the facts of Mr. Rojano’s case, the manner in which this offense was committed is not typical of a predatory, violent brutal sodomy of a child case,” Kelly said. “Mr. Rojano did not seek out or stalk (the victim). He was playing video games and she wandered into the garage. He inexplicably became sexually aroused but did not appear to consciously intend to harm (the victim) when he sexually assaulted her,” the newspaper reported. 

What the f***? What the f***ing f***? “Inexplicably aroused”? And he “assaulted” a three-year-old but did not “intend to harm” her? What kind of twisted mind comes up with that sort of rape apologism?

And it’s not unusual: all across the country, the pro-rape part of our population gleefully rape away, and are rarely punished for their heinous crimes.

When police officers, juries and judges are in favor of rape, how can we expect rapists to fear the law?

Mr. Blunt and Cranky