Yes, this is a week late, but she’s 12+ YEARS late, so let’s not get too arsed about a mere seven days, OK? In this article: http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2013/05/sandra-day-oconnor-shift-on-bush-v-gore.html, we read about her “misgivings” and “regrets” over her role in the Bush V. Gore ruling. Of course, her regrets are mostly because she didn’t like the reign of Bush The Dumber, which is pretty shallow of her, to put it mildly.

Putting it less mildly, she should be wracked with guilt for trashing the Constitution: http://archive.democrats.com/images/brief-1-6-01.html You see, the Constitution DOES NOT F***ING ALLOW THE F***ING SUPREME COURT TO DO ONE F***ING THING to resolve a slate of disputed Electors. That power is reserved to Congress. Period.

So, instead of being regretful over her unconstitutional actions in 2000, she’s hacked off because she didn’t like the Shrub. The Supreme Court violated the separation of powers, and crapped on the Constitution they claimed to respect, and all she cares about is her “legacy”. News flash: it’s already a tarnished, corroded piece of crap legacy, and crying crocodile tears won’t change it one whit.

What a lying sack of s***.

Sandra, we have your Crown O’ Polished Turds, and it should suit you to a Tee…

Mr. Blunt and Cranky